Author Archive

Mason positioned to help businesses meet current challenges

Friday, June 5th, 2009

Business school graduates and the programs that produce them — especially MBAs – have been coming in for some heavy criticism in recent months.

The shortsighted, greedy behavior of a number of members of Wall Street have had an effect on public perception, and some questioning of what is being turned out by business schools.  It seems inappropriate to blame an entire group for the inappropriate behavior of a few, but recent events have given all business schools reason to analyze what they are doing and what the resultant effects on the culture are.  

With this background in mind, I picked up a copy of Fareed Zakaria’s latest book, The Post American World.  Zakaria is an editor for Newsweek, a columnist for the Washington Post, and host of a weekly program focused on international relations.  I nearly always find him provocative, interesting, and thoughtful in his comments on world affairs.

In The Post American World,  Zakaria states that the US is undergoing a sea change, entering a new world which it can no longer dominate or overwhelm as it has in the past.  His message is not that the US is failing, but that other nations are rising – rapidly.  As a consequence, America will find it necessary to change its view of the world and its place in it. 

 He makes a number of suggestions about what the US cannot do and what it must do to continue to maintain its place among the leading nations of the world.  This is not the place to cover the myriad analyses and suggestions that Zakaria makes.  Rather, we can cut to the chase and say that Zakaria identifies one area where America can still dominate and where it can continue to have a huge impact.  That area is in the world of ideas.

If this is true, then William & Mary’s Mason School of Business is uniquely positioned to support American business in meeting the challenge of our times.  William & Mary requires all undergraduates to complete a liberal arts degree, even the Bachelor of Business Administration students.  Our individualized plan of study results in nearly half of our students completing a double major.

At both the undergraduate and graduate levels, there is virtually none of the ultra-large classes dominated by lectures where students are tested in ways that lend themselves to machine scoring of a mid-term and a final.  At William and Mary classes tend to be small, teaching tends to be interactive requiring students to work with the material they have read, and tests tend to be written and requiring analysis and defense of positions taken.

Furthermore, students are exposed to live business experiences, to the actual conduct of business research, and  to experienced business people who provide a useful and practical perspective on the use of what is learned in the classroom.

In short, our personalized, experience based model of education is not only revolutionary, but it is also uniquely appropriate for teaching students to think.  Our programs provide  an excellent preparation for entering a work world in which the US needs to lead with ideas and ways to implement them.

Reading Zakaria’s book not only confirms for me that we are on the right path, but makes me want to push even harder to fully exploit the potential of our personalized experience based model.

Teaching sets Mason apart from other schools

Friday, April 10th, 2009

I’m thinking today about differentiators in the MBA program.  Essentially we have two at the Mason School of Business.  Insofar as differentiators are what students identify as the reasons for picking W&M ‘s Mason School over others, our differentiators are the CAMS and the EPs.  These two program features are identified by more incoming students as reasons for coming to the school than any others.

I think we are all proud of these two signal features of our MBA, but I think we have another one, our teaching.  I am not afraid to claim that our teaching, overall, is better than the teaching one could get anywhere else.  I know that there are some great teachers in many other MBA programs, some more highly ranked than ours, and some not.  But I would lay the claim for us based on two factors.

First of all, good teaching is a requirement at William & Mary.  You cannot remain a professor here if you are not a good teacher.  At the same time, William & Mary is a research oriented institution.  That means that William & Mary seeks out those more highly paid academicians who are known for their contributions to the discipline, who work at the leading edge of the discipline, and who are paid a great deal more because of these things.

Many research-oriented institutions, including the very highly ranked institutions, pay lip service to, but are not nearly as focused on demanding good teaching as well.  Professors who are prolific publishers in these institutions often negotiate minimal instructional and classroom contact with students.

At William & Mary, on the other hand, prospective faculty know that both research and teaching are part of the institutional demand.  In a sense, then, the faculty is self selected.  A person who is primarily interested in research and sees teaching as an interfering nuisance would not want to be a faculty member at William & Mary.  Neither would people who just want to teach, because William & Mary pays the higher salaries and demands research productivity of their tenure line faculty.

I do know that several of our new faculty this year were advised by professors at their doctoral institutions not to interview here because of the teaching demand which, they were told, would interfere with the development of their research careers.  I don’t know if we are unique in this regard, but I do know that we are very rare.

And the byproduct of all of this is that we move students so far.  We have small classes.  We pay a lot of attention  to the individual students.  Virtually every student at William & Mary’s Mason School of Business will tell you that the professors were wonderful teachers, that they cared, and that thy would work with them individually to help them succeed in mastering the subject matter.

And, after their first year, going up against the best that the very top ranked schools have to offer in internships, our students routinely come back and tell us that they believe that they were at least as well prepared, an usually better prepared, than the other interns whom they worked with.

But all of this gets to be a differentiator only if it is so known and apprediated.  I’ve got to believe that it would be appreciated.  How do we get it to be known?